Graeme Wearden 

WPP shareholders revolt over pay following Sir Martin Sorrell’s departure – as it happened

Almost one in three WPP investors fail to back pay report, but Sir Martin Sorrell will still leave with £19m of share options despite investigation into personal conduct.
  
  

Questions over Sir Martin Sorrell’s exit from WPP will dominate today’s AGM.
Questions over Sir Martin Sorrell’s exit from WPP dominated today’s AGM. Photograph: Mark Runnacles/Getty Images

Summary: Shareholders rebel, but WPP ducks questions on Sorrell

Time for a recap, as shareholders stream home:

Advertising giant WPP has faced irate investors at its AGM, two months after CEO Sir Martin Sorrell suddenly quit amid allegations of improper conduct.

Nearly 30% of investors failed to back WPP’s remuneration report -- a tried and trusted method for City bigwigs to chastise errant company boards. There was also a smaller protest at chairman Roberto Quarta, with 17% of investors declining to approve his re-election to the board.

WPP may judge that this could have been worse; the company is no stranger to pay revolts, thanks to the whopping awards handed to Sorrell in former years.

Sorrell’s shock departure, and subsequent allegations of paying sex workers in petty cash and bullying junior WPP staff, loomed over the AGM at London’s South Bank.

Quarta defended WPP’s handling of the issue, saying Sorrell was treated like any other colleague when allegations were first made.

Quarta insisted that data protection rules simply prevented WPP saying any more about the issue.

In an attempt to shut discussions down, Quarta declared:

I know that questions remain, but there is really and simply nothing further we can legally disclose.”

He also defended WPP’s decision to allow Sorrell to leave with stock options worth around £20m. The company’s legal advice was that Sorrell could only lose the awards if he was guilty of ‘gross misconduct’.

Quarta also suggested that WPP understands it has a problem; the company has now launched a review of its policies.

Everyone deserves to be treated with respect, he declared -- which really ought to go without saying...

Shareholders at the packed AGM appeared split. One suggested that Sorrell deserved to lose the money because he was setting up a potential rival to WPP (S4).

But another small investor claimed that the allegations facing Sorrell (which he denies!)were “entirely immaterial”

[reminder, the FT claims he was spotted visiting a Mayfair brothel, and gave some junior staff a thoroughly miserable time].

Shareholders also challenged WPP over its pay scheme -- there was anger that the next CEO’s bonus could be eight times their basic pay.

The company was also criticised for launching a share buyback scheme, as the share prices has fallen sharply in the last year.

CO-COO Mark Read also looked to the future, saying WPP could survive without its founder, and needed a new ‘beating heart”.

Chief transformation officer Lindsay Pattison says there are plenty of suitable internal candidates:

Here’s our news story on the AGM:

That’s probably all for today. Thanks for reading and commenting. GW

Updated

WPP shareholders have had their say, so we’re onto voting on this year’s resolutions.

Of course, we already know that nearly 30% investors have rebelled over the pay report - as WPP released the ‘proxy’ votes at the start of the AGM.

The final voting numbers could be slightly different, and will be released this afternoon.

That’s the end of the AGM. Shareholders are heading for refreshments, and reporters are trying to grab a word with the WPP top brass....

Another WPP investor asks an excellent question about WPP’s share buyback scheme

Q: How much cheaper would it be to have bought last year’s shares this year?

Finance director Paul Richardson says WPP could have saved $150m, or £100m! That’s because it paid between £15 and £16 per share. Today, shares are only worth £12.60.

Updated

Another shareholder has spotted that WPP’s annual report mentions a cyber attack. What happened, and what was the damage?

COO Mark Read says WPP fell victim to a cyber attack in June 2017, which initiated in Ukraine.

Read says WPP acted quickly by shutting down computer systems to prevent the virus infecting the whole company.

WPP was unable to quantify the impact, but reckons it lose between £100m and £150m of revenue (although some may have been clawed back in subsequent months).

Read says it was a “wake-up call” for WPP, and argues that the company did “remarkable well” under the circumstances.

I think this is the ‘Petya’ ransomware attack, which hit companies across the world last summer.

Anger over WPP bonuses

Another shareholder asks about the pay on offer to WPP’s next CEO under its new share incentive scheme.

Apparently s/he can earn up to eight times basic pay, if all performance targets are hit.

Shareholders aren’t happy! One shouts out that this is excessive.

Quarta has defended his position as chairman of two FTSE 100 companies (he also chairs medical group Smith & Nephew).

Quarta says he can definitely act as non-executive chairman of both (he’s currently filling an executive role at WPP)

Q: Do you accept that succession planning at WPP was inadequate?

Chairman Quarta says the company had made some preparations for life after Sorrell, but it simply didn’t have “visibility” on when its founder and CEO might step down.

Obviously it didn’t expect the events of recent weeks. But once Sorrell quit, WPP moved from “desktop planning to a pro-active period”.

[WPP executives Mark Read and Andrew Scott are currently sharing the COO role].

Q: Are the obscene remunerations paid by WPP in previous years now a thing of the past?

Quarta says WPP recently approved a new remuneration policy, which will determine what the next CEO is paid [back in 2016, Sorrell picked up £70m]

Q: Would Sorrell still have been granted ‘good leaver status’, if the board had been aware of the revelations about his (alleged) use of company money?

Chair Roberto Quarta says he isn’t in a position to comment.

Q: How will WPP cope without Sorrell?

COO Mark Read says Sorrell did a great job turning WPP into an advertising giant, but he thinks the business can succeed without him.

Read says WPP needs a new beating heart, who can make the company a place where men and women across the world want to work at [another hint that the company’s culture must change]

One private shareholder criticises Roberto Quatra for not opening the AGM with a tribute to Sir Martin Sorrell.

He’s disappointed that Sorrell has quit over “highly immaterial issues” (!!), and is happy that he has held onto his LTPI share awards.

He hopes that the former CEO enjoys a happy retirement, rather than turning his new company into a large peanut and fires it into “the rump of the WPP elephant”.

A few shareholders applaud in support.

After a brief discussion about advertising strategy, another shareholder brings the AGM back to the issue of its former CEO:

Q: Surely it is gross misconduct for Sorrell to launch a competitor? Can’t we pull the plug on his stock options now?

Chairman Roberto Quarta thinks not. He says Sorrell has described his new venture, S4, as a ‘peanut’, that couldn’t compete against a giant like WPP.

Quarta adds that WPP has “confidentiality clauses”, and he’s sure that Sorrell wouldn’t want to jeopardise his share options by breaching them.

Updated

The pay revolt at WPP is big, but it could have been bigger...

Here’s some instant reaction:

Onto shareholder questions.

The first comes from Hermes Equity Ownership Services, who say WPP’s board has become “more effective” since Roberto Quarta became chairman in 2015.

But Hermes are still unhappy about the lack of transparency around WPP’s pay arrangements (which resulted in Sorrell leaving with £20m of options)

Q: What will be the priorities for the new CEO?

Quarta says Sorrell’s successor must provide strong leadership, a good grasp of technology, and have great client skills.

WPP shareholders rebel against pay

Boom! Nearly 30% of WPP shareholders have failed to approve this year’s pay report.

That’s a bloody nose for the advertising giant, as investors show their displeasure over the £19m of share options which Sir Martin Sorrell left with.

Including abstentions, just 70.5% of investors voted to approve the remuneration report, with 29.5% failing to back it.

There’s also a smaller rebellion against the chairman, with only 83% of investors voting in favour of Roberto Quarta’s re-election.

WPP COO Mark Read is now speaking about the business now, saying the company hopes to do well at the Cannes Lions festival next week.

Read also touches on the challenges facing the group, with data and technology are increasingly part of the future.

Read also touches on the cultural issues at WPP, saying:

We need an inclusive culture for our people. That is what is most critical to us.

Chairman Quarta tries to direct shareholders’ attention to the future, saying that the process of appointing a new CEO is well advanced.

Chairman Roberto Quarta now turns to the allegations of workplace bullying published by the FT this week.

Everyone is entitled to be “treated with respect”, Quarta says. Everyone at WPP should feel able to raise concerns and to have them listened and acted upon.

We take this very seriously, and have asked the new management team to review how policies are put into practice, and to identify where improvements are needed.

Updated

WPP: Sorrell wasn't guilty of gross misconduct

Quarta now turns to the £19m of stock options which Sir Martin Sorrell left with in April.

WPP received “very clear” legal advice that there was no basis to cancelling Sorrell’s entitlement to shares which were due to vest in the next five years, Quarta says.

He accepts that some shareholders find the share award scheme unsatisfactory.

The only way Sorrell could have lost the awards were if “gross misconduct” could be established, Quarta continues, and the board had received very clear legal advice that it could not.

Updated

WPP chair defends silence over Sorrell's departure

Quarta turns to the resignation of Sir Martin Sorrell, following an allegation of personal misconduct.

He says WPP took a “robust” approach to the allegations, treating him “just like any other employee would have been treated”.

We confirmed that the matter was wholly financially immaterial to WPP, says Quarta.

We understand that some people would like more details, but data protection law prohibits us from releasing more information, he insists.

Quarta continues:

We take this responsibility very very seriously indeed... There is really and simply nothing we can legally disclose.

WPP chairman Roberto Quarta is opening the AGM now, introducing the board.

Quarta says the clients he has met in recent weeks “recognise the quality of the talent that WPP have across the globe.”

I want to take this opportunity to thank the many thousands of talented people who make up WPP and drive its success, Quarta adds.

The AGM is getting underway now. No sign of the WPP’s most famous shareholder yet, though....

WPP have just released a trading statement to the City, ahead of the AGM.

It shows that revenues are down in the first few months of this year, although they’re actually up if you strip out currency moves.

  • Reported revenue for first four months down 3.4% at £4.822 billion, currency headwinds of 6.1% resulting in constant currency revenue up 2.7% at $6.633 billion, like-for-like revenue up 1.4%
  • Reported revenue less pass-through costs down 5.0% at £3.969 billion, currency headwinds of 6.1% resulting in constant currency up 1.1%, like-for-like revenue less pass-through costs up marginally
  • Constant currency net debt at 30 April 2018 up £66 million on same date in 2017, down significantly compared with the first quarter, with average net debt in first four months of 2018 up by £360 million over same period in 2017, similar to first quarter

The Financial Times piled fresh pressure on Martin Sorrell and WPP earlier this week, when it published an investigation into his departure.

The FT alleged that:

  • Two employees saw him entering a premises in London’s Shepherd Market, Mayfair, that is occupied by sex workers for the purposes of their trade.
  • That WPP staff were concerned he may have used company funds to pay for the alleged visit, after previously having concerns about his use of expenses.
  • Sorrell had a reputation for bullying his executive assistants and had created a fear culture at the company’s headquarters.
  • Staff feared he was misusing company resources for himself and his wife Cristiana.
  • He sacked his long-serving chauffeur on the spot after the driver refused to start work at 7am, five hours after driving Cristiana home.

Sir Martin’s representatives have strenuously denied allegations of misconduct, saying that the non-disclosure agreement which Sorrell signed prevents him from saying more.

Updated

Roberto Quarta

Role: executive chairman
Time with company: three years
Pay in 2017: £475,000

The Italian-American businessman, who is 69, has taken on Sir Martin Sorrell’s executive responsibilities while the company looks for a successor. The shareholder advisory group Glass Lewis has expressed concern about his ability to juggle his new duties as he is also chairman of another FTSE 100 company, the medical equipment firm Smith & Nephew.

Paul Richardson

Role: finance director
Time with company: 26 years
Pay in 2017: £3.8m

The finance chief of WPP has worked hand in glove with Sorrell for 22 of the 33 years that WPP has existed, having been appointed to the position in 1996.

Sir John Hood

Role: pay committee chair, non-executive
Time with company: four years
Pay in 2017: £110,000

The New Zealand businessman oversees the company’s pay arrangements, which have come under scrutiny due to the multimillion-pound share awards that Sorrell has typically been awarded. The 66-year-old former vice-chancellor of Oxford University will handle discussions with shareholders about the financial package handed to Sorrell on his exit. Some investors are angry that he is being treated as a “good leaver”, entitling him to at least £14m in payments, despite a lack of transparency about the allegations levelled against him.

Nicole Seligman

Role: senior independent director, non-executive
Time with company: four years
Pay in 2017: £91,000

The former president of Sony Entertainment is a highly respected legal mind who has provided legal counsel for a string of major companies and is a former clerk for a US supreme court justice. The 61-year-old, who also defended Bill Clinton during the Monica Lewinsky scandal, is also a former associate editorial page editor for the Asian edition of the Wall Street Journal, the newspaper that first revealed details of WPP’s investigation into Sorrell.

Jacques Aigrain

Role: audit committee chair, non-executive
Time with company: five years
Pay in 2017: £130,000

The dual French-Swiss citizen has enjoyed a long and prestigious career in the financial services industry, 20 years of it with the Wall Street bank JPMorgan Chase.

Tarek Farahat

Role: non-executive
Time with company: two years
Pay in 2017: £87,000

Farahat, a 54-year-old Egyptian-Brazilian, spent 26 years with the household goods firm Procter & Gamble, in marketing and executive management roles, eventually becoming president. P&G is the world’s biggest advertiser and a major client of WPP.

Ruigang Li

Role: non-executive
Time with company: eight years
Pay in 2017: £80,000

One of the company’s key sources of insight into the Chinese market, he is the founding chairman of CMC Capital Partners and CMC Holdings, Chinese platforms for media and entertainment investment and operations. The 49-year-old has been described as China’s Rupert Murdoch thanks to his media empire-building.

Sol Trujillo

Role: non-executive
Time with company: eight years
Pay in 2017: £90,000

Trujillo has been chief executive of multiple companies across the world, including Orange and Telstra, over three decades. Trujillo, 66, has particular experience in communications and technology and was an early champion of high-speed broadband.

Daniela Riccardi

Role: non-executive
Time with company: five years
Pay in 2017: £80,000

Riccardi is WPP’s retail guru, offering insight into consumer goods. The Italian is the chief executive of the luxury crystal firm Baccarat and was previously the chief executive of the international fashion brand Diesel.

Hugo Shong

Role: non-executive
Time with company: five years
Pay in 2017: £80,000

A marketing and publishing expert with extensive experience of China and other Asian markets. The former journalist formed China’s first technology venture capital firm, IDG Capital Partners, which was to invest in a string of China’s most successful internet companies such as Baidu and Tencent.

Sally Susman

Role: non-executive
Time with company: five years
Pay in 2017: £80,000

Susman, 56, is the executive vice-president of corporate affairs at the world’s largest pharmaceuticals company, Pfizer. She also has far-reaching experience in corporate responsibility and governance.

WPP shareholders will push the board about the allegations of workplace bullying levelled against Sorrell in recent days. Is there a cultural problem at the heart of the ad giant?

They will also want to know why the ex-CEO is still getting share awards worth millions, and why WPP has botched the succession plan so badly. The failure to tie Sorrell down with a non-compete clause looks like another blunder --- allowing him to launch a new company that could compete with WPP.

WPP shareholders gather for bruising AGM

WPP shareholders are massing at London’s Southbank, for today’s annual general meeting.

As explained earlier, the world’s largest advertising company faces heavy criticism from investors over the recent shock exit of founder Sir Martin Sorrell, and the cloak of secrecy which the firm has tried to throw over the issue.

Some shareholders are certain to vote against WPP’s pay policy, in protest at the decision to allow Sorrell to leave with future share awards worth up to £20m.

Chairman Roberto Quarta is also in the firing line over his handling of the crisis.

My colleague Rob Davies predicts a “chastening showdown with investors”.

WPP has been embarrassed by a string of allegations – strenuously denied by Sorrell – that have leaked into the public domain about the advertising and marketing guru’s behaviour.

Claims have emerged that WPP staff said they witnessed the 73-year-old entering a premises used by sex workers, leading to concerns that the alleged visit was paid for with company money.

Rob is outside the AGM now, and reports that security guards are preventing photographers from snapping away:

The AGM is due to start at noon.

Updated

Gig economy news: A heating engineer has won his claim against Pimlico Plumbers, establishing that he was a worker and not self-employed.

It’s an important ruling by Britain’s Supreme Court, which establishes that Gary Smith is entitled to various benefits including holiday pay.

Pimlico Plumbers had argued (unsuccessfully) that Smith was self-employed - even though he was wearing their uniform, drove around in a van with “Pimlico Plumbers” on the side, and had a contract saying he could be ‘dismissed’.

The ruling could encourage more of Britain’s gig economy workers to challenge their employers.

Peter Dowd MP, Labour’s Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury, points out that inflation is still running over the government’s target - and eating into pay packets.

Dowd is calling for more help for workers, especially those earning the minimum wage:

“This is the sixteenth consecutive month in which inflation remains higher than the Bank of England’s target, and working people are still struggling with real earnings continuing to be lower than in 2010, following eight years of Tory economic failure. Yet the Government refuses to act in any meaningful way.

“The next Labour government will introduce a £10 per hour Real Living Wage to tackle the squeeze on wages, and build a high wage, high skill economy for the many, not the few.”

Updated

London rents are falling

We have fresh evidence that London’s housing market is cooling.

Private rental costs in the capital have fallen over the last year, by 0.2%. That’s the first annual decline since September 2010, after Britain plunged into recession.

Across the country as a whole, rents rose by 1% in the last year -- lagging behind pay rises and the wider inflation rate.

But in the East Midlands, tenants are being charged 2.9% more than a year ago, followed by the South West and the East of England (both 2.0%).

The jump in transport costs is a blow to anyone planning a trip abroad.

Martin Lane, Managing Editor of money.co.uk, explains:

“The rising cost of fuel prices has really taken its toll on our finances and had one of the biggest impacts on keeping inflation put. The cost of air and sea fares being on the rise month on month – not great for those looking to book a last minute summer holiday.

Suren Thiru, head of economics at the British Chambers of Commerce (BCC), predicts that inflation could rise in the coming months - but probably not for long.

“It is possible that inflation may start to drift upwards in the coming months as the recent spike in oil prices filters through supply chains and into higher consumer prices.

However, any pick-up in inflation would be relatively short-lived, with price growth likely to resume its downward path later in the year as the pressure from oil prices eases.

Fidelity: Inflation shows underlying weakness.

UK households should be relieved that inflation isn’t higher.

City economists had expected CPI to rise to 2.5% last month, meaning inflation would be taking an even bigger chunk of our pay packets (reminder, basic pay grew by 2.8% over the last year).

Weaker inflation also gives the Bank of England less reason to raise interest rates.

Tom Stevenson, investment director for Personal Investing at Fidelity International, thinks the BoE has missed the opportunity to raise interest rates this year.

With UK CPI stuck at 2.4% despite rising petrol prices and higher airfares, the release confirms the underlying weakness of the UK economy. Today’s data follows yesterday’s lower than expected wage growth and Monday’s weak manufacturing data.

Computer games and sweets pulled inflation down

Computer game prices fell in May, helping to keep inflation down.

The ONS explains:

Prices for these games are heavily dependent on the composition of bestseller charts, often resulting in large overall price changes from month to month.

The ONS adds that “sugar, jam, syrups, chocolate and confectionery” prices also dropped during the month. Vegetable prices rose, though.

Torsten Bell, head of the Resolution Foundation, says fuel prices are the main driver of inflation right now:

Treasury: We're doing our bit

Mel Stride MP, financial secretary to the Treasury, has responded to the inflation data:

“Since last year inflation has fallen from its 3.1% peak but we recognise the cost of living is still a challenge for some families.

“That is why we are freezing fuel duty at the pumps, cutting income taxes for 31 million people and increasing the National Living Wage.”

Petrol prices hit highest since 2014

Today’s inflation report also shows that Britain’s drivers are suffering higher prices at the pumps.

Petrol prices hit a three and a half-year high last month, as motorists faced the impact of higher crude oil.

The Office for National Statistics says:

Petrol prices rose by 4.6 pence per litre between April and May 2018 to stand at 125.3 pence per litre in May, the highest average price since October 2014. This compares with a 1.0 pence per litre fall between the same two months of 2017 to stand at 116.4 pence per litre in May 2017.

Similarly, diesel prices rose by 4.7 pence per litre between April and May 2018 compared with a 1.6 pence per litre fall between the same two months a year ago.

These recent rises reflect increases in the price of crude oil.

UK inflation holds steady

Newsflash: Britain’s inflation rate was unchanged at a one-year low last month, despite the pressure from higher energy prices.

The Consumer Prices Index rose by 2.4% in May, matching April’s rate. Inflation hasn’t been lower since March 2017.

The ONS says:

  • Rising motor fuel prices produced the largest upward contribution
  • There were also large upward effects from air and sea fares, which rose between April and May this year but fell between the same two months a year ago, influenced by the timing of Easter.
  • Partially offsetting downward effects came from price changes for games, domestic electricity, food and non-alcoholic beverages, and furniture and furnishings.

More to follow....

As a WPP shareholder himself, Sir Martin Sorrell could attend today’s AGM and ask a few searching questions.

That’s unlikely, though, as Sorrell signed a non-disclosure agreement when he left WPP in April.

That NDA has prevented Sorrell responding in detail to the allegations aired in the papers in recent days. However, he has denied the Financial Times’s claim that he was spotted entering a Mayfair brothel a year ago.

As Sorrell’s spokesman said earlier this week:

Sir Martin signed a non-disclosure agreement when he stepped down which precludes him from discussing any of the circumstances surrounding his departure. He has rigidly adhered to this obligation and will continue to do so.”

Most WPP shareholders have already cast their votes ahead of today’s AGM.

Sky News’s Mark Kleinman has heard that one in four are opposing the pay report -- presumably due to concern that Sorrell walked away with bonuses worth up to £19m.

Shareholder advisory group Glass Lewis is also lining up against Roberto Quarta, by advising investors to vote against the chairman’s re-election.

Glass Lewis said it also has “severe reservations about supporting the remuneration report at this time.”

America’s second-largest public pension fund will vote against the re-election of Roberto Quarta at WPP’s annual meeting today.

California-based Calstrs said it would vote against Mr Quarta’s re-election, as well as the re-election of non-executive director Hugo Shong. The FT has more details.

That’s a blow to Quarta, who is already under pressure over his handling of Sorrell’s exit (particularly his £19bn bonus package).

Updated

The Times also predicts a lively shareholder meeting:

The questions WPP must answer

My colleague Rob Davies has pulled together a list of questions which WPP should answer at today’s AGM regarding Sir Martin Sorrell’s shock departure earlier this year:

  • Why did the company sign a non-disclosure agreement with Sorrell that prevents shareholders from understanding the reasons for his departure?
  • Given the lack of transparency around the misconduct allegations, why is Sorrell classed as a “good leaver”, granting him access to up to £20m in future payments?
  • What steps has the company taken to verify claims by company employees that they saw Sorrell entering a premises used by sex workers?
  • Were board members aware of allegations that he misused company resources by making expense claims for personal costs, and if so, what did they do about them?
  • Did board members know about allegations that Sorrell bullied his executive assistants, and if so, what did they do about them?
  • Did board members offer sufficient challenge to Sorrell’s reign over the company, or did they fall into line?
  • Why was there no succession plan in place in case of Sorrell leaving the company suddenly, and what progress has been made in finding a successor?
  • Were details of the investigation into Sorrell’s conduct leaked by another board member, and if so, can investors have confidence in the board’s functionality?
  • Will there be cultural and strategic change at WPP, and if so, what would that entail?
  • Are directors concerned Sorrell will lure clients to his new venture S4 Capital, and why does he not have a non-compete clause preventing him from setting up a rival firm?
  • Does Roberto Quarta have enough time to serve as executive chairman of WPP, given that he is also chairman of Smith & Nephew, another FTSE 100 company?

The BBC predicts that around 25% of WPP shareholders will oppose the decision to hand Sorrell up to £19m in bonuses over the next four years.

Those payments are due because the company agreed to treat their departing CEO as a “good leaver”, despite the investigation into his conduct.

WPP exec: Staff deserve respect

The front-runner to succeed Martin Sorrell at WPP has launched a review of the company’s codes of conduct.

Mark Read, chief executive of WPP’s digital marketing agency Wunderman, wrote to all staff yesterday to remind staff of the company’s “values”.

Read highlighted some of the bullying allegations against Sorrell (he’s accused of swearing at underlings and calling them useless).

Read says:

“When I come to work I expect to be treated with respect by my colleagues, and every one of you reading this has the right to expect the same.”

“You will no doubt have read the press coverage this week about WPP and Martin Sorrell, including allegations about his behaviour towards people at the parent company.

“Although we can’t comment on specific allegations, I feel we should remind ourselves of and reinforce the kind of values we want and need to have within every part of our business: values of fairness, tolerance, kindness and – again – respect.

“It should hardly need saying that all WPP working environments must be places where people feel safe and supported. They must also be places where people are able to raise concerns if they want to, and where those concerns are dealt with when they need to be.”

The agenda: UK inflation and WPP revolt

Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of the world economy, the financial markets, the eurozone and business.

Britain’s cost of living squeeze is in the spotlight this morning, as we get new inflation figures showing how price changed in May.

City economists predict that the Consumer Prices Index rose to around 2.5% last month, up from 2.4% in April, squeezing household budgets.

That would be a blow to consumers, especially as we learned yesterday that basic wage growth slowed to 2.8% in the last quarter,

Royal Bank of Canada predicts that CPI could even have hit 2.6%, which would almost wipe out real wage growth. They point out that petrol prices have risen steeply in recent weeks, as higher oil prices feed through to the pumps.

On the other hand, Marc Brütsch of Swiss Life thinks inflation might be unchanged.

So the pound could be volatile when the data is released, as inflation is a key factor determining whether the Bank of England raises interest rates soon.

Advertising giant WPP will also dominate the headlines today, as it faces irate shareholders at its AGM.

Investors are furious that former CEO Sir Martin Sorrell was allowed to quit the company in April with millions of pounds worth of share awards, despite facing allegations of personal misconduct.

We’ve subsequently learned that those allegations centred on claims of workplace bullying and paying for a sex worker using funds from WPP.

Sorrell turned WPP from a small wire basket maker into the world’s largest advertising company.

He would have featured highly on a list of Britain’s most respected executives - before recent events unfolded.

Shareholders will demand answers about Sorrell’s departure, and succession planning (or the lack of it) at WPP.

Some will vote against WPP’s pay policy, which is set to hand Sorrell future share awards worth up to £20m, despite a lack of information about the reasons for his departure.

Investors are also unhappy that Sorrell wasn’t bound by a non-compete clause, allowing him to set up a new technology and content company called S4.

There could also be a revolt against chairman Roberto Quarta. Tin hats could be needed....

The financial markets look quiet, as traders wait for the US Federal Reserve’s decision on interest rates tonight (a hike is widely expected).

The agenda:

  • 9.30am BST: UK inflation data for May
  • Noon BST: WPP Annual General Meeting
  • 7pm BST: US Federal Reserve interest rate decision
  • 7.30pm BST: Fed chair Jerome Powell’s press conference

Updated

 

Leave a Comment

Required fields are marked *

*

*